Noah Sarna on the issues, cases and events of interest to British Columbia's educational community
SCC grants leave to hear appeal in Access Copyright dispute
The Supreme Court of Canada earlier this month granted leave for an appeal of the Alberta Minister of Education from the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Alberta (Education) v. Access Copyright (CanLII).
In a nutshell, the dispute pits ministries of education and school boards against Access Copyright, a copyright collective. Access Copyright successfully argued before the Copyright Board of Canada that unauthorized reproduction of certain materials by schools was a violation of its copyright, which did not fall within the fair use provisions of the Copyright Act (Department of Justice). The Board also ordered that certain copying entitled Access Copyright to royalties.
Here is an early discussion on this case from this blog. Here is a discussion of the broader concerns for Access Copyright.
July 7, 2022 - 7:08 pm
As a quick note, the Canadian Copyright Act carves out its exceptions through “fair dealing” as opposed to the United States’ “fair use.” While pointing out the difference is often an exercise in pedantry, the application to educational use often turns on those nuanced differences. If I can pull my head above the work that you can guess I’m buried in at the moment, I’ll read the case and post some commentary.
July 7, 2022 - 7:28 pm
In the case of the U.S. Copyright Act, s.107 (Fair use) offers a very broad exemption:
“…the fair use of a copyrighted work … teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include —
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
…”
It is important to note that the US generally works in a model of infringing or fair use, whereas Canada relies on a levy system. Therefore, when they carve out an exception to infringement (and I usually prefer to think of copyright as carving a protection out of the public domain, but anyway). they carve it out completely. The counterattack is to narrow the applicability of that exception, as they’ve done with the DMCA, the Sonny Bono Term Extension (see Eldred v. Ashcroft), etc.
In Canada, we don’t broaden or narrow the exception so much as vary the levies charged by the central collection bodies depending on the nature of the dealing. Radio stations pay one levy, DJs at private gatherings pay another, and schools and libraries are subject to other classes of levies.
What is interesting to note is the fourth characterization of the “fair use” in the U.S. Act:
“(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.”
This seems to go to the heart of Access Copyright’s argument. The Canadian Act does not give carte blanche to educational institutions, but rather a narrow set of educational permissions. This seems to create a very large area in which the Board, Access Copyright, etc., can allow certain use if a levy is paid, and otherwise puts a heavy onus on the educational institution to frame its use within the fair dealing exceptions. Michael Geist has been calling for a radical opening of these exceptions for years.