Posts tagged school act

BCCA favours BCTF in class size grievance against school employers

The BC Court of Appeal has released its decision (CanLII) in another round of litigation over class sizes between the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation (BCTF) and the British Columbia Public School Employers’ Association (BCPSEA), setting aside the original arbitration and court decisions and sending the matter back to the initial arbitration stage with some guidance.  Essentially, the court sided with the BCTF, which has claimed the victory.

Here is the BCPSEA’s take on the decision, which includes a fairly comprehensive backgrounder and overview of the judgment.  Here is the BCTF’s press release.  Here is coverage from the Vancouver Sun’s education reporter, Janet Steffenhagen, on the decision;  scroll to the bottom of the page to review some of the public comments.

Class size has been a hotly contested issue between teachers and their employers in public schools for many years (see here for another post on the subject).  This most recent decision of the BC Court of Appeal serves to further refine the meaning of the provisions on class size added to the School Act (BCLaws).  See here, here, here, here, and here (CanLII) for a sampling of decisions dealing with these provisions.

Share

The long, winding road between the principal’s office and the courtroom

One of the great benefits of this blog is that I get to hear from many people involved in education who have one common quality: they care.  Whether it is parents, teachers/professors, administrators – you name it – education brings together a community of caring.  But any group of concerned individuals dealing with complicated and sensitive issues normally carry the baggage of a multitude of disputes and nasty disagreements.   What should and shouldn’t be taught?  What is permissible and prohibited behaviour by educators and students?  What institutional response is appropriate?  And so on.  Particularly with respect to the pre-university stage, the world of education is pregnant with discord.

My experiences as a parent have taught me enough to know that your kids – and concerns about how they are influenced and treated by non-parents – become your life.  Nothing grabs more at your core than a sense of your child being handled unfairly or their potential being denied.  That’s why whenever a parent contacts me about an alleged wrongdoing about their child, I feel it.  I can understand it.  There are a thousand and one ways we can deal with certain issues, and calling a lawyer is one of them (and it’s often the most appropriate one).  But there is a long and winding road standing between a school-based dispute and the courtroom.

If something is very serious and involves a crime or the likelihood of a crime about to be committed, call the cops.  Otherwise, for public schools the legislature has set up an appeals procedure in the School Act (BCLaws) to deal with rank-and-file disputes (see Section 11 in particular, and check out the Appeals Regulation).  There is only one case to my knowledge, Hewko v. B.C. (CanLII), that involves a grievance which started within the Section 11 process.  The decision includes a helpful discussion on the legislative backdrop and shows an interesting example on how it plays out.  (My thanks to Judith Anderson at Harris & Company for an excellent presentation in the fall on the subject.)

The courts are there for a reason, and lawyers are important for making the issues clear to a judge.  But this system is in place for the handful of disputes, among the many, that truly need it.  I know very few lawyers who would prefer to pay the bills by playing the role of courtroom pitbull, rather than helping people resolve their disputes at an earlier stage.

Share

A peek into student records

Anonymity in Western countries is now almost impossible.  In the age of the internet, each one of us has some public record or image.  We leave streaks of ourselves in any user-generated website, like facebook,  myspace, youtube and linkedin.  We write letters to the editor, comment on blogs, and the list goes on.  As a result, we all have a history that can be accessed – easily – by almost anyone at any time.  The ability to “google” someone can be a good thing or a bad thing, depending on who is doing the googling, whether the information is accurate or unjustly intrusive, etc.

Similarly, some records are important, and some are not.  When it comes to children, many parents reflect on their own journeys and successes and can clearly identify what doors needed to open for them to obtain the goods things in life.  Generally, it starts with school.  Getting into law school at McGill meant I needed to thrive in my undergrad, which meant I had to develop good skills in high school and earlier, which meant I couldn’t be one of those kids school administrators and teachers thought was a trouble-maker or a flake to be admonished or doubted until I proved myself to be otherwise.

Each step wasn’t absolutely necessary to achieve the end result, and it is possible to arrive at the same place from a far less fortunate path, but for my children I definitely prefer they enjoy all the advantages that I had every step of the way.  That is why many parents want to minimize those items that could present a risk – like the contents of student records, which are there to present a reference point for educators at each institution their children attend.

But what are student records?  What do they, or should they, include?  Should every challenge or misdeed of a student be marked down for every subsequently educator to review?

In British Columbia, there are specific rules for what should be held by school administrators in every student record.  Consider the following provisions of the School Act (British Columbia) in relation to public schools:

  • Section 9: Each student and their parents are entitled to examine the student records held by a school board in relation to that student while accompanied by a principal or other appointee.
  • Section 79: Each school board must establish and maintain a record for every student registered with a school within that board’s jurisdiction and have written procedures for storing, retrieving and using student records.  As well, each school board must ensure that information in each student record is kept confidential, although they may be ordered to allow access to a person providing support services.
  • Section 79.1: If separate records are kept concurrently by multiple educational authorities that pertain to a single child involved with each of those authorities, then each authority must provide the other with access to their student records in respect of the child.
  • Section 170: Every employee or person otherwise engaged by the Ministry of Education must not disclose information in a student record unless required to administer these laws or conduct business of the Ministry.  As well, every such person must swear an oath not to disclose this information and if they break that oath that have committed an offence.

More specifically, the contents of the student record that must be established and maintained under section 79 above are set out in Ministerial Order M082/09.  Each board must ensure that the record maintained for each student enrolled in the public school system includes:

  1. A completed version of the most recent Ministry of Education form entitled “Permanent Student Record” (PSR) and all documents listed as inclusions on that form. The PSR form generally shows whether there are any medical or legal alerts (e.g. restraining order) associated with the child, general student information (e.g. name, Personal Education Number, date of birth, etc.), and the student’s record of school (e.g. where, when, etc.).  The inclusions listed on the PSR form involve documents that help plan or support the student’s education program.  Certain documents must be included; for example, any copies of restraining orders.  Other documents may be included; for example, information an educator (namely, a principal) deems relevant to the education program of the student.
  2. Student progress reports for the two most recent years or a copy of the student’s transcript.
  3. If letter grades are not set out in progress reports for certain years, a written record of those letter grades.
  4. The student’s current Student Learning Plan, if any. A Student Learning Plan is the plan set out in the Career and Personal Planning 8 to 12 Integrated Resource Package (1997) educational program guide.
  5. The student’s current IEP, if any. An IEP – or Individual Education Plan – is defined in Ministerial Order 638/95 as a series of specific learning outcomes designed for a student and includes special assistance and support services available for the student.

Each school board generally has policies addressing these requirements.  For example, the Policy Manual of the Vancouver School Board includes a section on student records, which provides guidance to teachers and administrators about the contents of student records:

[Access] to teachers’ notes may be requested by parents or students under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Any such requests should be referred to the school principal.  When preparing notes for insertion in teacher or classroom files, the information should be factual and worded in a careful, professional manner. Insertions intended to go into the formal student file kept in the office should be dated and signed.

While educators have a responsibility to keep all relevant student information on file and to protect the privacy of others, if information is being released, there is a companion responsibility not to retain information that is irrelevant to the student’s educational program or general well-being. This is a professional responsibility that requires careful review and consideration… It is the principal’s responsibility to decide whether or not documents are relevant to the educational program of the student and, therefore, whether they should be listed in the List of Inclusions and maintained in the student file. All student records should be up-dated and culled regularly.

Another important aspect of Ministerial Order M082/09 is what a board must do with the student records it holds when one of its students transfer elsewhere:

On receipt of a request from a board to which a student transfers and is enrolled, a board must transfer [the documents referred to above] to that board… Where a former student of a board is enrolled in an independent school… and a board receives a request from that independent school… the board must transfer a copy of the documents [referred to above].

This means there is some degree of discretion on the part of educators to choose material to be included, and that your child’s student record will trail them, for better or worse, until their graduation.  (If the last school you attended was within the jurisdiction of the Vancouver School Board, then you can obtain a copy of your PSR by completing a form located here.)  The legislature has acknowledged that parents, guardians and students have a right to access a student’s file.  This right should be exercised in a manner that, on the one hand, respects the administrative burden it can place on schools but, on the other hand, also recognizes the light it sheds on the relationship between an educator and a student and the impact a student record may have on a child’s future.

Share

Do school labour disputes risk bypassing students’ interests?

Won’t somebody please think of the children?!

There was an interesting article last week by Janet Steffenhagen of the Vancouver Sun dealing with a recent labour decision involving the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation (BCTF) and the British Columbia Public School Employers’ Association (BCPSEA).

The claim arose from an alleged violation of the class size prohibitions under section 76.1 of the School Act (BC), which only allows school boards to put more than a certain number of students in each class if the principal of the school either obtains the consent of (or consults with, depending on the grade) the teacher.  As a result, the teachers’ union was demanding:

  1. a declaration that certain boards of education had violated section 76.1; and
  2. compensation awards for the teachers hard done by, with additional funds to support the local teaching community.

In other words, teachers were the ones to suffer from this misconduct, and they should be rewarded accordingly.  As the arbitrator put it:

When a board of education exceeds grade level size and composition standards for a class and does not meet the requirements with respect to the class, the burden of the breach is primarily borne by the teacher(s) of the class, not the principal, superintendent, trustees, or even individual students.

It was that last part that really irked Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond and John Bird, two heads of groups with the welfare of children as a primary goal.  What the teachers get from the arbitrator’s decision is clear, but what do the students get? Haven’t they suffered from being jammed into classrooms together with an overwhelmed teacher?  Turpel-Lafond hinted further that this is an example of how the educational system is increasingly shaped by labour disputes and financial constraints.

Labour issues do play a central role in defining the rules that apply to educational actors.  The School Act is structured to place the ball in the BCTF’s court where a school board steps out of line, particularly on the issue of class sizes, which has been the subject of legal disputes in the labour context for many years.  There is no clear mechanism (or, at least, no clear precedent) for a student who advance a claim, for example, if a school board violates section 76.1.

Interestingly, the BCTF appears to dispute the notion that this model benefits teachers while prejudicing students: see the BCTF press release on the decision here.

Another point that’s been made on the decision is who should pay for the breach.  Almost anytime a government body is found liable and a damages award is ordered, that body pays but the burden flows directly to the taxpayers, which further reduces the resources available to students.  See here for a letter to the editor of Times-Colonist from a former BCTF leader, arguing that the individuals who made the impugned decisions should be disciplined.

Share
"));