<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Education Law Blog &#187; constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://educationlawblog.ca/tag/constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://educationlawblog.ca</link>
	<description>Noah Sarna on the issues, cases and events of interest to British Columbia&#039;s educational community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Noah Sarna on the issues, cases and events of interest to British Columbia&#039;s educational community</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Education Law Blog</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://educationlawblog.ca/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Noah Sarna on the issues, cases and events of interest to British Columbia&#039;s educational community</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Wanting money back from a university? Be careful what you wish for</title>
		<link>http://educationlawblog.ca/311/</link>
		<comments>http://educationlawblog.ca/311/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>noahsarna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultra vires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationlawblog.ca/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many readers have expressed outrage (or, at the very least, mild dismay) at the legal principle set out by the BC Court of Appeal in Barbour v. University of British Columbia (CanLII) and discussed in a recent post on this blog: namely, that the legislature can pass laws that have the effect of retroactively altering the rules applicable to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://educationlawblog.ca/311/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court to hear claim of religious student group denied recognition because of university non-discrimination policy</title>
		<link>http://educationlawblog.ca/u-s-supreme-court-to-hear-case-involving-religious-student-group-denied-recognition-because-of-university-non-districrimination-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://educationlawblog.ca/u-s-supreme-court-to-hear-case-involving-religious-student-group-denied-recognition-because-of-university-non-districrimination-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>noahsarna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationlawblog.ca/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should a university recognize and allow funding for a student group that requires its leaders to abide by a strict personal code that includes limits on sexual orientation?   Tomorrow &#8211; April 19 - the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on precisely that issue with respect to CLS v. Martinez.  This is the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://educationlawblog.ca/u-s-supreme-court-to-hear-case-involving-religious-student-group-denied-recognition-because-of-university-non-districrimination-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

